A Field Guide for Product Marketing Managers Tired of Cosmetic Strategy
Why most internal positioning work fails, and how PMMs can lead with clarity, not decoration.
I. Who This Is For
This guide is for Product Marketing Managers in B2B SaaS who are tired of being treated like internal copywriters while being held accountable for strategic clarity. You’re asked to fix “positioning” but handed a Google Doc with bullet points. You’re told to unify product, sales, and marketing but given no authority, budget, or framework.
This isn’t a how-to on messaging. It’s a handbook for PMMs ready to lead positioning as organizational design, not corporate storytelling.
II. Why This Guide Exists
Most “positioning” work is cosmetic. It lives in taglines, homepages, value props, pitch decks. It looks like clarity but feels hollow. Why? Because the company has never actually decided what it is.
Meanwhile, PMMs are stuck mediating internal debates with no structure, no decision rights, and no strategic lens.
If you’ve tried April Dunford’s five-step method or Fletch PMM’s canvas and still found yourself in circular alignment meetings, here’s the truth:
These tools live in marketing. Positioning lives in the business.
This guide rejects messaging-led frameworks and gives you the structure to lead real positioning conversations that touch strategy, not just copy.
III. The Real Challenge: Misalignment, Not Messaging
According to Miller Heiman Group, only 19% of organizations achieve true go-to-market alignment. The rest operate in strategic fog. PMMs feel it first: you’re asked to produce clarity without having it.
The State of Product Marketing Report 2024 shows:
- 66.3% of PMMs say they have leadership support
- 35.6% lack a dedicated positioning budget
- PMMs must align with 88.8% of product teams and 81% of marketing, while holding no decision-making power
This is the positioning paradox:
- You are responsible for strategic clarity
- But you’re not authorized to decide what the company is
Which is why 90% of effective positioning is internal alignment, not external messaging. That number isn’t from a single study; it’s what emerges when you trace every failed GTM motion back to its root cause: no agreed-upon definition of the business.
IV. Most Internal Positioning Conversations Fail. Here’s Why.
- They confuse positioning with messaging
Taglines ≠ Positioning. Homepages ≠ Strategy. - They operate by committee
“Let’s get everyone’s input” quickly turns into consensus-led mush. - They avoid tradeoffs
Everyone wants positioning to include their feature, audience, or priority. No one wants to cut. - They assume internal opinions = market truths
Sales anecdotes become positioning inputs. Product roadmap becomes narrative. - They use marketing frameworks to solve strategic problems
Positioning statements without pricing alignment, product tradeoffs, or operational backing = vapor.
V. Why Mainstream Frameworks Aren’t Enough
April Dunford’s “Obviously Awesome”:
Good at naming the components of positioning. Weak at creating organizational coherence. Treats positioning as something PMM builds and hands off.
No treatment of tradeoffs, operating models, or cost structures. It’s messaging in disguise.
Fletch PMM:
Helpful for PMMs looking for quick diagnostics. But again, it lives in the world of messaging clarity, not positioning defensibility.
Their canvas doesn’t force business model alignment or ownership of a mental territory.
If your “position” can be changed in a slide deck, it’s not positioning. It’s surface tension.
VI. What Actually Works: The 4-Level Positioning Canvas
Positioning is not what you say. It’s what you prove — operationally, strategically, and repeatedly.
Here’s the only lens that forces that rigor:
Level | Definition | What It Reveals | Copyability | Cost to Fake |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Saying It | Taglines, mission statements, positioning docs | Easy | Low |
2 | Proving It | Case studies, metrics, social proof | Somewhat difficult | Medium |
3 | Being It | Strategic sacrifices, pricing moves, product constraints | Hard | High |
4 | Owning It | Business model built around a single mental territory | Nearly impossible | Existential |
The best PMMs don’t try to fix Level 1. They surface Level 3 and 4 gaps.
VII. How to Lead the Positioning Conversation (Without Authority)
Step 1: Stop Fixing What’s Not Defined
Refuse to update the messaging before the business agrees on what it is.
Ask:
- What concept do we own that no one else can claim without breaking themselves?
- What would we stop doing if we took our positioning seriously?
- What’s the one word that explains what we are to the market?
Don’t be the person who polishes confusion.
Step 2: Run a Positioning Audit Using the 4-Level Framework
Facilitate a cross-functional session and ask:
- Level 1: What are we currently saying?
- Level 2: What backs it up?
- Level 3: What decisions cost us something to reinforce this?
- Level 4: What part of the business would break if we changed this?
If most of your “position” lives in Levels 1 and 2, you have messaging. Not strategy.
Step 3: Limit the Room. Define Decision Rights.
Use RASCI to limit sprawl:
- Recommends: PMM
- Approves: CEO or CPO
- Supports/Consults: Product, Sales, Marketing leads
- Informs: Rest of GTM org
Don’t run a brainstorm. Run a strategy session.
Keep the core positioning team to 4–5 people max.
VIII. Department-by-Department Objections to Prepare For
Team | Common Objection | How to Disarm It |
---|---|---|
Sales | “This isn’t how prospects talk” | Include top reps in development. Build battle cards, not docs. |
Marketing | “Product keeps changing features” | Tie positioning to outcomes, not features. |
Product | “That’s not what the product does” | Align around where the roadmap is going. Frame around value. |
Leadership | “This narrows the market too much” | Show how narrow = defensible. Wide = vague. |
IX. What PMMs Need to Do Next
You don’t need a better tagline.
You need to move your org from Level 2 to Level 4.
- Use positioning audits to surface misalignment
- Challenge the org to make strategic tradeoffs
- Design your facilitation process with conviction, not consensus
- Align product, sales, and leadership around one noun, not a paragraph
If it can be changed in a slide deck, it’s not positioning.
If your competitors can say it next week, you don’t own it.
If the business doesn’t live it, the market won’t believe it.
X. Finally
If your company changed nothing but its messaging, would the market even notice?
If the answer is no, then you don’t have a positioning problem.
You have a business clarity problem.
And PMM is the only function equipped to surface it.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.