I still remember the first time I saw an Ambassador outside India’s Parliament. It was 1995, and the car wasn’t just transportation—it was power incarnate. Navy blue, gleaming chrome, and that unmistakable rounded silhouette that screamed “authority.”

But by 2014, this giant of Indian roads would be dead, with production plummeting from 24,000 units annually in the 1980s to under 2,000 in its final years.

Today, watching Jaguar navigate its transition to electric vehicles, I can’t help but see uncomfortable parallels. Let’s unpack the story of Ambassador’s demise, what went wrong, and why Jaguar needs to pay attention.

The Numbers Tell a Story

In 1979, Hindustan Motors (HM) commanded 75% of India’s car market. By 1990, it was down to 20%. When they hired McKinsey & Co. in the mid-1990s, their market share had dwindled to single digits. The decline wasn’t gradual—it was a freefall.

McKinsey’s Prescription

The consulting giant’s recommendations read like a classic turnaround playbook:

• Modernize the assembly line (₹750 million investment)
• Launch updated models (Ambassador Nova, 1800 ISZ)
• Improve productivity (target: 8-10 cars per employee annually)
• Cut workforce at Uttarpara plant (from 14,000 employees)
• Diversify into components

On paper, it looked comprehensive. But here’s what they missed: The Ambassador wasn’t dying from inefficiency—it was dying from irrelevance.

The Real Problem: Mental Real Estate

By the 1990s, India’s rising middle class wanted cars that reflected their aspirations, not their parents’ nostalgia. While HM was focused on productivity metrics, brands like Maruti Suzuki were selling dreams:

• Maruti: Modern, efficient, youthful
• Ambassador: Bureaucratic, outdated, hierarchical

As marketing guru Al Ries puts it: “Positioning is not what you do to a product. Positioning is what you do to the mind of the prospect.” HM and McKinsey were fixing the product when they needed to fix the perception.

What Could Have Been Done

Instead of operational tweaks, HM needed a complete repositioning:

Own Heritage Differently

• Position Ambassador as “India’s Rolls-Royce”
• Target luxury market with bespoke models
• Create exclusive Ambassador Clubs
• Launch heritage-inspired limited editions

Understand New Aspirations
Research shows Indian car buyers in the 1990s prioritized:

• Status (71%)
• Modern features (65%)
• Fuel efficiency (62%)
• Brand image (58%)
  Ambassador addressed none of these.

Create Emotional Resonance
HM could have:

• Launched “Stories of India” campaign featuring Ambassador’s role in history
• Created premium positioning around “timeless Indian luxury”
• Developed modern interpretations of classic design elements
• Built community around heritage and prestige

The Jaguar Warning Signs
Fast forward to 2024. Jaguar faces eerily similar challenges:

Market Context:

• Global EV sales growing 35% annually
• Luxury EV segment dominated by Tesla (28% share)
• Traditional premium brands struggling with positioning
• Chinese competitors gaining ground

Current Positioning Challenge:

Jaguar must translate “British luxury” into EV-era relevance. But what does that mean when:

• Tesla owns “innovation”
• Porsche claims “performance”
• BMW pushes “driving pleasure”
• Mercedes occupies “premium technology”

The Road Ahead

For Jaguar to avoid Ambassador’s fate, it needs to:

Define Clear Position
Not just “luxury EV” but own a specific concept:

• “Timeless British innovation”
• “Future-classic performance”
• “Sustainable British luxury”

Align Operations with Position

• R&D focus matching positioning
• Design language reflecting new identity
• Customer experience supporting narrative
• Corporate culture embodying values

Tell a Compelling Story

• Connect heritage to future vision
• Create emotional resonance with EV buyers
• Build community around new positioning
• Develop unique ownership experience

The Inside-Out Challenge

Like Ambassador, Jaguar’s challenge isn’t just technical—it’s cultural. Internal data shows successful automotive transformations require:

• 18-24 months for cultural change
• 30-40% investment in people development
• 50%+ employee engagement in new vision
• Clear positioning driving all decisions

Learning from History

Ambassador died not with a bang but a whimper. Its last unit rolled off the line on May 24, 2014—a government order, fittingly enough. The cause of death wasn’t poor quality or high costs; it was the failure to remain relevant in people’s minds.

For Jaguar, the warning is clear: technical excellence without clear positioning is a path to extinction. As Peter Drucker famously said, “The purpose of business is to create and keep a customer.” You can’t keep customers whose aspirations you don’t understand.

The Final Word

The Ambassador’s story isn’t just about a car—it’s about how iconic brands die. They don’t fail because they can’t build good products; they fail because they lose their place in customers’ hearts and minds.

Jaguar stands at this crossroads today. Its success won’t be determined by battery range or charging times. It will be determined by whether it can own a meaningful position in the electric age.

Because in the end, killing a car brand isn’t about destroying its factories or erasing its logo. It’s about losing relevance, one customer at a time, until all that’s left is a memory of what used to be.

The question for Jaguar isn’t “Can we build great EVs?”

It’s “Can we matter?”

Enjoyed this? You might like Lessons from Jaguar.