{"id":90341,"date":"2026-10-27T12:44:42","date_gmt":"2026-10-27T16:44:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/?p=90341"},"modified":"2026-10-27T13:05:24","modified_gmt":"2026-10-27T17:05:24","slug":"spotify-the-playlists-nobody-wants-to-leave","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/spotify-the-playlists-nobody-wants-to-leave\/","title":{"rendered":"Spotify: The Playlists Nobody Wants to Leave"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A note before we begin: <\/em><\/strong>I have been watching Spotify for years, and I have a lot of respect for what Daniel Ek, Martin Lorentzon, and the team have built. Getting a product to the point where hundreds of millions of people open it every month takes rare patience, and most companies never get there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My interest is narrower than a company review. I spend my time studying how a business connects to its customers, and Spotify is one of the most revealing cases I have looked at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I worked from public material: Daniel’s interviews, the company’s announcements and filings, and 300 public listener, creator, and artist reviews and comments from the App Store, Google Play, and Hacker News, plus what advertisers, authors, artists, and creators wrote on Reddit, Trustpilot, Digiday, and author blogs. I tried to get every detail right. If a fact is wrong or I misread an intention, that is my error, and I have no intent to misrepresent Daniel or anyone at Spotify.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daniel, Alex, and Gustav have internal data I will never see. They know what their listeners tap, skip, and pay for every day, and they may read this and disagree with my conclusion. What I can offer is an outside view, because no one can read their own label.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The entire premise of this article is to answer one question: what business are you in?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How to read this analysis<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

The 4-Level Positioning Canvas is the framework this analysis uses. Here is a fast orientation before you get into the report. There are four levels. They build in a specific sequence. You cannot skip them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 4 \u2014 POSITION (Own the Noun). <\/strong>
This is the concept that becomes synonymous with you in customers’ minds. Volvo owns safety. Tesla owns the future. It takes 5 to 10 years to establish, and you can’t claim it explicitly; you have to prove it implicitly through decisions made consistently over time. The moment you say \u201cwe own X,\u201d you weaken the claim. Proof must precede the words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 1 \u2014 FRAME (Articulate).<\/strong>
This is how you put the positioning into language: taglines, messaging, narrative. It is the easiest level to develop and the weakest barrier. Anyone can change their words. Most companies live here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 2 \u2014 EXECUTE (Prove with Verbs).
<\/strong>This is where you validate the positioning with measurable outcomes. Not claims about what you do; evidence of what you have delivered, with a baseline, a result, and a way for customers to verify it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 3 \u2014 LIVE (Embed Structurally).
<\/strong>This is positioning built into the structure of the business: resource allocation, hiring criteria, partnerships, what you refuse to build. The standard is 70% or more of resources flowing to positioning-critical capabilities. At this level, the positioning survives a CMO change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The sequence runs Level 4 \u2192 Level 1 \u2192 Level 2 \u2192 Level 3. You start by finding the noun you want to own, then you learn to articulate it, then you prove it with outcomes, then you wire it into the structure of the company so it runs without anyone saying it out loud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most companies operate at Level 1 while claiming to be at Level 4. They have the language. They do not have the proof or the structure. The gap between where a company actually is and where it believes it is: that is where this analysis lives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TL;DR \u2014 For Daniel<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Daniel, you and your team describe Spotify as an audio technology platform still working to serve the right thing for every moment. You own plenty with music listeners, and my reading is that once the app learns them, plenty becomes recognition<\/strong>. One App Store music reviewer sums up the catalogue as \u201cUnlimited songs, unlimited offline repeats\u201d while another points to \u201cexcellent recommendations that go along with the genre or mood I\u2019m in.\u201d Outside music, the experience splits: ali_macrecs on the App Store calls Spotify for Creators \u201ctruly the easiest way for us to upload and share our content,\u201d beklynnn on r\/audiobooks uses the monthly book allowance for \u201cnew releases with extended holds on Libby,\u201d and independent musician Analista con lupa on Trustpilot feels \u201ctrapped in a clear financial loop\u201d paying for outside ads to get seen inside the catalogue. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Your music listeners picked plenty. You earned it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moving a music listener from plenty to recognition has been your operating filter the whole time. You held the Free tier open when Taylor Swift pulled her catalogue in 2014 before returning in 2017, added up to 5 genre-steering buttons to Discover Weekly in June 2025 so Premium listeners could guide their Monday picks, bought the music-context database WhoSampled in November 2025, and expanded Prompted Playlists in January 2026 across a listener’s full history from day one. Every one of those decisions fits that two-step stack. None of them fits a generic audio service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From 2006 to now, you played a first game: licensing the world’s music, removing friction, and letting listeners build a history in one place. For the next decade, with you as Executive Chairman on the long arc and Alex and Gustav running daily operations as co-CEOs, the game is making sure every listener correction sticks while deciding whether audiobooks, artist tools, podcasts, and advertising will ever follow the same rule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The filter belongs inside the company: <\/strong>in hiring, capital allocation, product reviews, and what you refuse to ship. Never put it on a billboard. The position is what Spotify already does for music listeners, rather than what it claims in press releases. Daniel, any rival can license the same songs to match plenty<\/strong>, and only a service that lets a listener correct what it gets wrong about their taste turns that catalogue into recognition<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Part 1: The Story They Tell<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

In May 2025, sitting on the NYNext podcast, Daniel Ek asked himself a question and answered it in the same breath: \u201cLike what would the perfect Spotify look like? Well, the perfect Spotify would just serve you that one thing you know you want in that moment.\u201d A few sentences later, he graded his own company against that bar: \u201cSo, we still have some ways to go before we’re at that point where we can just serve you that magical thing that you didn’t even know that you liked better than you can do yourself if you really put in the work for it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That’s the standard he sets. Beat what a person could do for themselves if they put in the work. He used the same test when he and Martin Lorentzon started Spotify in Stockholm in April 2006. In 2006, a listener could pirate every song for free. In 2025, a listener can dig for new music by hand. Both times, Ek measures Spotify against what a determined person would do alone. In 2010, he told The Telegraph that you can never legislate away piracy, and that the only way to solve the problem was to build a service that was better than piracy while paying the music industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ask him what Spotify does day to day, and he talks about taking friction out between two sides of a market. On NYNext, he put it this way: \u201cAnd we’re constantly just trying to remove the friction so that it’s easier and easier for both creators to work with consumers and us to be able to find whatever they may be interested in in that moment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In September 2025, he sat down with David Senra on the Founders podcast and went back to day one: \u201cI love music and I wanted to figure out a way where consumers got what they wanted and creators were able to get paid by doing what they love to do.\u201d In the same conversation, he described the role he carved out for himself inside the building: \u201cAnd so, I just made it my effort to understand and know the creator way better than anyone else in the company. And so, my product feedback to them comes from that lens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He runs the company on long timelines. Before launching in Sweden, Norway, Finland, France, and Spain in 2008, he and Lorentzon spent 2 years negotiating licenses with Universal, Sony, Warner, and EMI, and gave the four major labels and Merlin about 18% of Spotify for 8,804.40 euros. He brought the service to the US in 2011, passed 10 million paid subscribers in 2014 and 100 million monthly users in 2016, and took Spotify public through a direct listing on the New York Stock Exchange in 2018. Through all of it, he defended the ad-supported Free tier when labels and critics wanted it killed, because Free is how most listeners start: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spotify reports on Loud & Clear that more than 60% of first-time paid subscribers start on Free.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a bet worked against that open model, he reversed it. He bought Gimlet, Anchor, and The Ringer to push into podcasts, tried locking top shows behind a Spotify wall, and then dropped exclusivity in February 2024 when renewing Joe Rogan’s deal so the show went back onto Apple, YouTube, and Amazon. He told Senra why he never sold the company during the lean years: \u201cAnd if I truly believed that there would’ve been a company that could further our mission and cared about what we cared about as much as we did, I probably would’ve sold. But I never found that. And because I didn’t find that, we just kept going.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The business he refused to sell is now huge and profitable. By Q4 2025, Spotify had 290 million paid subscribers and 751 million monthly active users. After years of losses, it made its first full-year profit in 2024 and an operating profit again in 2025. According to Loud & Clear, Spotify has paid nearly $70 billion to the music industry since launch, including more than $11 billion in 2025 alone. In its Q4 2025 earnings release in February 2026, the company called itself a technology platform for audio and for all the ways creators connect with audiences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 30 September 2025, Ek announced that on 1 January 2026 he would hand day-to-day operations to co-CEOs Alex Norstr\u00f6m and Gustav S\u00f6derstr\u00f6m and become Executive Chairman. He wrote to employees and shareholders: \u201cTo be clear, I’m not leaving.\u201d He explained where his attention would go next: \u201cAs Executive Chairman, I will spend more of my time on the long arc: strategy, capital allocation, regulatory efforts and the calls that will shape the next decade for Spotify.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every phrase Daniel and his company use in public, from removing friction between two sides of a market to building a technology platform for audio, is about what Spotify builds, what it pays out, or what it hopes to build later. None of those phrases says what a music listener actually uses Spotify for today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the story he tells. It’s honest, patient, and backed by 20 years of hard choices. It’s also incomplete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Part 2: The Hidden Position<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Spotify doesn’t own streaming. Streaming is the delivery. It doesn’t own discovery either. Rivals have discovery. What music listeners say is plainer. They say there is no limit, and they say it has any song they want. With music listeners, Spotify owns plenty<\/strong>, and underneath plenty sits recognition<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Plenty<\/strong> is what a music listener has when they stop rationing or buying tracks one by one because every song they want is already there when they open the app. Recognition<\/strong> is my name for where plenty goes once the app has learned you, when the catalog stops being all the music in the world and starts being your music, and you recognize yourself in what plays next.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Listeners say “Plenty” out loud on the App Store, Google Play, and Hacker News. Apple, Amazon, and YouTube also license plenty from the same labels. Few listeners recognize those words, yet even when they complain about ads, prices, or limits, they stay because years of playlists and saved songs live here, and the weekly picks match their taste.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This only holds for music listeners. Read all six of Spotify’s customer bases side by side, and you can hear where the stack holds and where it breaks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Music listeners.<\/strong> On the App Store, listeners start with plenty and shared playlists:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIt has very very, very great music. I love how you can turn off your iPad or phone or electronic and it still play the music that you want and I love how there\u2019s no limit and I\u2019m like until like there\u2019s no limit for like how many songs you can save or like I also love the house like there is lots of different music to choose and if you type in your music, it brings your favorite one. I\u2019m glad they have all of the musics.\u201d (Night_Angle, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cSo I love the fact that it has any song I want. It\u2019s just some song like Spanish song they get deleted like Makabelico Jan glack and many more Spanish singers but I mean I get it.\u201d (\ud835\udcb4\u2134\ud835\udcce\ud835\udcbe\ud835\udcc8\ud835\udcc8, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cAll the songs I like are here and I love making playlists with my friends\u201d (Victor, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201call my friends use it and my class even have a class playlist\u201d (Demi, British App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Stay longer with music listeners on the App Store and Hacker News, and you hear how they use the app to find and keep what fits them:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cEven without Spotify premium, I still love Spotify because it recommends me music I\u2019ve never even heard of and it actually really matches my taste !\u201d (Nick Valdes, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cBut I don’t see how it does those things, and those are the main reasons I use Spotify. 80% of the time I listen to automatic playlists based on my music tastes and hear new and old (but new to me) music constantly. If I don’t like it I skip the track to the next as much as I want. How on earth am I supposed to do that if I have to buy and curate every new album into my collection?\u201d (SirMaster, Hacker News)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI use the song radio mode to find tracks relevant to distinct songs that I’ve enjoyed recently, and I find this incredibly effective at unearthing new material that I really like. For many years, I’ve had no trouble with this finding new artists and quite different songs. Then if I’ve listened to those a few times, that seems to populate Discover Weekly with a new angle.\u201d (prawn, Hacker News)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cA valuable part of streaming services is the recommendation engine. Spotify generates a new playlist called Discover Weekly that has songs and bands loosely related to what I\u2019ve been listening to. I turn it on while I do yardwork. If I like something I pause and add it to a playlist.\u201d (Aurornis, Hacker News)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cno matter what I do always come back to it and nothing is better than Spotify. I have all my playlist on here.\u201d (Coolkid2379, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Night_Angle and \ud835\udcb4\u2134\ud835\udcce\ud835\udcbe\ud835\udcc8\ud835\udcc8 talk about a library with no ceiling. Then Nick Valdes, SirMaster, prawn, and Aurornis show what happens inside that library over time. Prawn uses song radio to dig up new tracks, plays the ones that fit, and watches Discover Weekly pick up the new angle the following week. Aurornis pauses during yardwork to save a song. And Coolkid2379, right at the end of a complaint about ads, explains why they never leave: their playlists are here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The music listener complaints prove the same stack from the other side:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cAbsolutely. I’ve made several new Spotify and Pandora accounts over the years. Initially they offer good recommendations but eventually the algorithms always aggressively funnel down to the same 2-to-3 dozen similar-sounding songs (though its a different set of songs with each new account). Once trapped in that algorithmic tarpit, the only thing to do is start over, which is annoying. Now I let myself discover things via human critics or just in the course of life.\u201d (sfRattan, Hacker News)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cSo instead, to support artists, I decided to set a budget and start collecting vinyl. It feels right. I still get all the benefits of Spotify for discovery and convenience, I support artists, and I appreciate having a tangible artifact representing my enjoyment.\u201d (lukev, Hacker News)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI love this app because it can play with my PS 4, but why TH can’t I pause the music quickly? that’s pure B.S.!!! and you don’t even have ‘Enter Sandman’ with Lemmy and Metallica, you should hide your heads in shame!!!\u201d (John, Google Play)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

When the algorithm funnels sfRattan down to two or three dozen similar tracks, the recommendations stop fitting, and they wipe the account to start over. When John cannot pause quickly on a PS4 or find Lemmy and Metallica’s version of “Enter Sandman,” plenty breaks on the spot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Audiobook listeners.<\/strong> In late 2023, Spotify added 15 hours of audiobook listening per month to Premium Individual plans, and to the plan manager on Duo and Family plans, with paid 10-hour top-ups when the clock runs out. Listen to what happens when a customer moves from unmetered music to a 15-hour timer:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cAbsolutely! It’s really useful for accessing new titles or those that have long waitlists on Libby.\u201d (petronius84, r\/audiobooks)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI tackled “King Sorrow,” which is a lengthy read at 26 hours. I began it towards the end of the month to seamlessly continue after it was renewed.\u201d (SwarlesDarwin, r\/audiobooks)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI think this app is generally really good easy to use easy to understand Great user interface they have access to tons of music, audiobooks podcast and other things the thing that I don\u2019t like is that I\u2019m on a family plan and they only allow like a certain amount of audiobook hours, and they make everybody else charge. If that\u2019s not the case the only one allowed to use some of the extra features is the main account holder for the family plan other than that Great app\u201d (jobz@30, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

A 15-hour monthly limit changes how people use the app. petronius84 uses those hours to skip a long library waitlist on Libby, and SwarlesDarwin starts a 26-hour book near the end of the month so the next month’s hours arrive halfway through the story. On a Family plan, jobz@30 complains that only the main account holder gets the audiobook hours. With music, listeners do not have to count hours. With audiobooks, they have to plan around the cap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Advertisers.<\/strong> Media buyers have no public review page for Spotify ads, and in an April 2026 Digiday report on the Spotify Ad Exchange, agency buyers described a channel with useful reach and mixed returns:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cFor brands where we\u2019re buying audio, it\u2019s a must-have partner,\u201d says Mary O’Brien (PMG, Digiday)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cCampaigns have driven strong, highly efficient performance for clients,\u201d says Christina Skirvin (Rain For Growth, Digiday)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cOur experience with Spotify specifically has been mixed,\u201d says Dana Heins (NP Digital, Digiday)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Even in that trade article, media buyers are not talking about plenty or recognition. They are weighing reach, efficiency, and mixed returns on client spend.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Music business (artists, labels, and managers).<\/strong> On Trustpilot’s page for Spotify for Artists, where the rating sits at 2.2 out of 5 across 32 reviews, working musicians describe what it feels like on the supply side of the catalogue:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI like Spotify’s artist platform. To know the data of streams, countries, and others.\u201d (Andy, Trustpilot)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cIf someone of the same name exists, (which is very frequent with multiple same names) then you get put on someone else’s profile.\u201d (Alan Burke, Trustpilot)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cSo how I am paying for studio for my music, paying for a distributor that suppose to get a cut on my income and I am a not entitled to get the real number myself?\u201d (Guillaume Etouman, Trustpilot)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Andy likes checking his stream counts by country. Alan Burke has the opposite problem: because he shares a name with another musician, his songs end up on someone else’s profile. Guillaume Etouman pays for studio time and a distributor and still cannot get clear numbers on his own earnings. While a music listener gets recommendations matched to their taste, these artists are still trying to get their own songs on the right profile and see what they earned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Podcast creators.<\/strong> On the US App Store feed for Spotify for Creators, the newest reviews are short and upbeat about getting a show published:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cEasy to use and I appreciate how fast I can get a podcast started\u201d (Frank Slow Films, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cI love how easy this app is to use with voiceover. As a blind person, I love that.\u201d (pefalls26, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cFive stars Spotify for Creators makes it easier for independent creators like me to bring our voices, stories, and ideas to life.\u201d (ImRobertoCarrasco, App Store)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Making an app easy enough that a first-time host or a blind creator using VoiceOver can publish a show is real entry utility, with no proof yet that uploading turns into a lasting audience or income.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Authors and publishers.<\/strong> Independent authors testing Spotify’s digital-voice audiobook tool describe a production tool that works and a store that doesn’t yet know how to put books in front of readers. On the blog Writers Supporting Writers, author chucklitka walked through making an AI-narrated audiobook on Spotify:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThey offer a list of words to check the narrator\u2019s pronunciation, which you can then correct if needed.\u201d (chucklitka, Writers Supporting Writers)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cStill, all in all the experience, after your first time, is straightforward.\u201d (chucklitka, Writers Supporting Writers)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cNot being a book platform, I have no idea how readily your books will be found, though I believe audiobooks on Spotify is a growing business. I am going to upload a limited number of my shorter books, and may report back in a month or two.\u201d (chucklitka, Writers Supporting Writers)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

chucklitka likes the pronunciation check and the setup, then names the main problem: because people think of Spotify as a music service, an author has no idea whether readers will find a book there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across all six groups, the boundary is plain. Spotify owns plenty with music listeners, and over years of saved playlists and weekly picks, that plenty becomes recognition. Outside music, Spotify rations audiobook readers, leaves working musicians fighting profile mix-ups and middleman math, gives podcasters an easy starting line, and has no public customer proof yet from advertisers or book authors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The noun explains every decision<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Spotify’s music decisions line up behind plenty and recognition. In September 2026, it rolled out Taste Profile in beta to Premium adults in the US and New Zealand so listeners can read Spotify’s text summary of their taste and delete notes to steer their Home recommendations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The pricing decisions follow the same logic. On the Canadian plan page, Spotify sells a Free ad-supported tier next to paid plans that start at $13.99 a month for Individual and run to $23.99 for a six-person Family plan. Free makes plenty real before a listener ever pays a dollar, and it gives the app time to learn their taste while rivals lock non-payers out. In audiobooks, putting a 15-hour monthly cap on the plan manager and charging for 10-hour top-ups breaks plenty by design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Distribution and licensing do the same job. In September 2025, Spotify gave Free listeners worldwide Pick & Play, Search & Play, and Share & Play so anyone can search and play a track or tap a song a friend sent without being forced into shuffle. Behind the scenes, Spotify renewed direct licensing deals with Sony Music Group and independent-label agency Merlin in September 2025 so the catalogue stays full.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The refusals protect the same stack. When Spotify connected to ChatGPT in October 2025 so users could ask for music picks inside a chat, it refused to let OpenAI train its models on Spotify’s music, podcast, or audiobook catalogue. In August 2026, it announced an AI Persona policy that badges synthetic voices and excludes unfollowed AI Personas from default algorithmic recommendations, refusing to let synthetic clones crowd out real artists in a listener’s discovery feed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If Spotify never published another sentence about itself, you could still see who the company was built for by watching where the rules change. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A music listener starts for free, gets songs on demand, and gets controls to correct what the app recommends. An audiobook listener gets a monthly hour limit. An artist who shares a common name can find their songs placed on another musician’s profile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n

\n \n
\n \n

Subscribe to keep reading<\/h2>\n \n \n

\n It's a subscribers only post. Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.\n <\/p>\n \n \n

\n \n
\n Subscribe<\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n \n<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A note before we begin: I have been watching Spotify for years, and I have a lot of respect for what Daniel Ek, Martin Lorentzon, and the team have built. Getting a product to the point where hundreds of millions of people open it every month takes rare patience, and most companies never get there. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":90328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"subscribers","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":true,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"{title}\n\n{excerpt}\n\n{url}","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":true,"rank_math_title":"","rank_math_description":"","rank_math_canonical_url":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90341","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gravity-report"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7CVvN-nv7","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/GettyImages-2170596177-e1776976389787.webp?fit=1440%2C958&quality=80&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90341","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90341"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90341\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":90363,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90341\/revisions\/90363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90341"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90341"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90341"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}