{"id":4902,"date":"2026-08-14T15:40:36","date_gmt":"2026-08-14T19:40:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/?p=4902"},"modified":"2026-10-10T12:41:10","modified_gmt":"2026-10-10T16:41:10","slug":"ramp-the-best-experience-is-the-one-you-dont-see","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/ramp-the-best-experience-is-the-one-you-dont-see\/","title":{"rendered":"Ramp: The Best Experience Is the One You Don’t See"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Ramp, Eric Glyman, and the position they built by accident and never named<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A note before we begin: <\/em><\/strong>I have been watching Ramp for a while now, and I think highly of what Eric Glyman and his co-founders have built. Getting a finance product to the point where customers describe it with relief takes years of internal discipline, and most companies never get there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My interest is narrower than a review of the company. I spend my time on the question of why certain businesses align with how customers see their own work, and Ramp is one of the clearer cases I have come across.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I worked from public material: interviews, launch language, acquisitions, product decisions, and what customers write when no one from the company is in the room. I tried to get every detail right. Where a fact is wrong, or an intention is read incorrectly, that is my error, and there is no intent to misrepresent anyone or their work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eric has internal data I will never see. He may read this and disagree with the central claim, and he may have good reason to. What I can offer is the view from outside the glass, which is the one thing a company cannot get for itself; no one can read their own label.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The analysis has a single purpose: to answer one question. What business are you in?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A quick note on the framework<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Positioning works at four levels, and the levels are not equal in difficulty or durability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 4, POSITION, sits at the top. <\/strong>It is the concept that becomes synonymous with a company in the customer’s mind. Volvo owns safety. Tesla owns the future. Getting there takes five to ten years, and holding it takes decades. It also cannot be claimed out loud. A company that announces it owns a concept has already weakened the claim, because ownership only registers when it is proven implicitly, through what the company does and what customers repeat back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other three levels are the machinery underneath, and they run in order: 1, then 2, then 3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 1, FRAME, is articulation.<\/strong> It is the language on the site, in the pitch, in the sales deck. This is the easiest level to build and the weakest barrier in the set, since a competitor can rewrite its homepage in an afternoon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 2, EXECUTE, is proof by verbs. <\/strong>It is the set of measurable outcomes that validate the claim, the results a customer can verify, and a rival would have to match rather than restate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Level 3, LIVE, is structural embedding. <\/strong>Positioning shows up in resource allocation, hiring, and partnership choices, with most of the money and headcount flowing to the capabilities the position depends on. Copying this level means rebuilding a company, which is why it is hard to replicate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reading order for the analysis follows that logic: Level 4 first to name the concept at stake, then Levels 1, 2, and 3 to test whether the concept is earned. Levels cannot be skipped. Most companies operate at Level 1 while claiming Level 4, having written the sentence and assumed the rest would follow. The distance between what a company says and what its structure and results prove is where the analysis lives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TL;DR \u2014 For Eric, directly<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

You think you built the corporate card that helps companies spend less, and then the financial operating system that runs on it. Your customers describe something you have never put in a headline, and they do it in four markets at once. A finance owner on Hacker News says the whole process became “completely mindless.” A founder on r\/startups says one card program “effectively saves a full FTE worth of time.” A salesperson on Reddit says, “I love ramp!!!! Zero expense report to do.” A CPA firm owner on G2 calls it “a win-win tool for SMBs and their accountants.” Someone on r\/CFO says you’d have to pry it from their cold, lifeless hands. Five voices, and not one says savings. They all describe an absence. The noun you own (your implicit position) is weightlessness<\/strong>: running a company’s money without carrying it. Your customers picked it. You earned it through costly business decisions and refusals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since 2019, you have used one test: “Does this take work off the customer’s hands?” In February 2020, you launched with a flat rebate and no points, no tiers, no lounges. Points would have given your customer a reason to start checking what their own staff was buying. From 2020 on, the core product cost $0 per user in a market that charges per user, because you only get a card into every employee’s hand if the cards are free. In 2021, you bought Buyer<\/strong><\/em> and did the customer’s vendor negotiating for them instead of selling them a tool to do it themselves. In 2023, you bought Cohere.io<\/em><\/strong> to reduce the time customers wait for a support response. In 2024, you bought Venue<\/em><\/strong> because procurement is the first place a growing company adds staff. And in 2025, you told CFOs that AI at Ramp is about moving people to different work, not cutting them, even though cutting them was the easiest thing you could have sold. One position explains all six of those calls. Nothing else does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

For seven years you pointed that test at one layer of back-office work after another. The next ten years are the same test aimed at money that software spends on its own. Visa, Mastercard and Amex cannot follow you there, because their business runs on paying a human cardholder to spend more, and an AI agent buying tokens is not a human you can pay. An IPO does not change any of that. It just means outside people start checking whether the test is real.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Use the test inside the company. In hiring, in where the capital goes, in roadmap reviews. Do not put your noun weightlessness<\/strong> in marketing. If you say it out loud, the next customer whose limit you cut without warning proves you wrong in public, and you have cut limits without warning. Eric, you sell time. What your customers actually got is a back office that stopped growing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Part 1: The Story They Tell<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Ask Glyman what Ramp is, and the answer has barely moved in six years. Ramp is the first corporate card that helps companies spend less. That sentence is from the February 2020 launch release, and the company still talks that way today: spend less, raise your bar, a financial operations platform for companies that want to achieve more by spending less.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He has a sharper version for investors, and it is the best line he has. On the Cheeky Pint podcast, he put the whole competitive set into one contrast: “probably the largest point of differentiation at the meta level between Ramp and maybe the financial service providers that we compete with is they sell money, and we sell time. They’ll sell you a loan at a lower cost of capital. Rewards wherever they set them. We will sell your expenses. Done.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He counts. He gives Ramp’s age in days in his writing and in his interviews. He told Fortune, “We’re religious about it. We count the days. We’re 2,367 days old.” When he handed his co-founder the other half of his title in June 2026, the post opened with another day count: for the last 2,656 days, we have run the company this way. Time is what he measures, and he measures it inside Ramp before he offers to save yours.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He has a shipping gate, reported by more than one person who has heard him use it: Does this save time or money for customers? If it does, we can ship it. If it doesn’t, we don’t. Every product review at Ramp runs through a question about time and money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most of what he says now is about the machines. Ramp’s agents review every expense rather than a sample, at a scale he describes in the tens of millions of decisions a month and on the order of a hundred thousand expenses a day. Company-reported figures put policy enforcement at 99% accuracy and manual reviews down about 85% for early Policy Agent customers. He talks about a second growth curve in which software and agents earn revenue alongside the card. He talks about thinking money, self-driving money, zero-touch finance. He told an audience at Ramp’s own conference to expect 30x productivity on Ramp by 2027. On X, in June 2026: “For 2000 years, business was built on two pillars. Today, a third: intelligence. It’s your least governed cost.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ask him why customers choose Ramp, and the answer is velocity. Ship faster than anyone else, keep the gate simple, let the product do the selling, and the market sorts itself out. He is unusually disciplined about not overselling that: when Ramp announced its November 2025 valuation, he wrote that no, you won’t magically start growing at 100% YoY, which is a rare thing for a founder to publish in a funding post. He talks about redeployment rather than replacement when the subject is AI and finance headcount, telling CFO Dive that this isn’t a story about replacing people; it’s about redeploying them. He hires on demonstrated work rather than credentials. Every one of those is an operating rule he can state cleanly, and every one of them is about how much work gets done and how fast it gets done.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also has a competitive account of the moment, and it is accurate. The company that ran the same wedge from the same starting point is now inside a bank, Ramp is the category’s only independent at scale, and the incumbents are shipping Ramp-shaped products two to six years late. He reads that as validation of the model, which it is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And he has numbers that make it all sound settled. Seventy thousand businesses. Roughly $200B in annualized purchase volume. Around $1.5B in annualized revenue growing near 89%. Free cash flow positive since November 2025. A $750M Series F at $44B in June 2026, co-led by GIC and Ontario Teachers’. Visa, Uber, Shopify, Anduril, Figma and Notion on the logo wall. When you have that record, your explanation of it stops being questioned, including by you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Every piece of that is a mechanism, a metric, a gate or a growth curve. Spend less is a sales claim. Selling time is a comparison with competitors. Counting days is a habit inside the company. Thirty-x by 2027 is a target. The grandest thing Ramp ever published about itself, once in 2021 and never again, was its claim to increase the lifespan of businesses through intelligence and automation. The company dropped it and went back to talking about time and money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One more sentence belongs in this inventory, and it is the most interesting thing he has said in public. On X in April 2026: “we’ve spent years trying to get people off of ramp\u2026 the best experience of ramp has always been the one you don’t see.” That is not a tactic. That sentence is the position, said as a rule about the product and never claimed as who the company is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the story he tells. It is accurate, unusually specific, and the most disciplined founder narrative in the category. It also describes the wrong thing, and it is not the reason 70,000 companies will not go back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Part 2: The Hidden Position<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Ramp doesn’t own spend management, and it doesn’t own time. They own weightlessness<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Weightlessness, in plain operating language, is the state a finance owner reaches when running the company’s money no longer requires them to carry it: no report to file, no receipt to chase, no queue to work through, and, on top of it, nothing left to check. It is not the job done faster. It is the job gone, and the watching stopped. The customer who bought speed says it is much faster. These customers say the process became mindless, that nobody has to lift a finger, that there is zero expense report to do, and that they could not go back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That difference is the whole diagnosis, and you can see it in how customers talk when nobody has asked them a question. They describe absences in words like zero, doesn’t have to, never had to, and not lift a finger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Group one: the founder who is also the CFO.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Companies under a hundred people. They sign themselves up, they have no finance team, and they do not want one. What they are pulling off is hard. They give a card to everybody on the team, and nobody in the building is responsible for checking what gets bought. They decide fast and out of habit. They tell you how they feel before they tell you the numbers. When they are loyal, it comes out as a refusal to go back, not as praise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“It makes the whole process completely mindless, whereas before it was filled with lots of busy work to keep our accounting clean and organized.” (cdolan, Hacker News)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“With Ramp, we can instantly create multiple cards per staff member, so they have one card per project we’re working on… Our accounting group doesn’t have to lift a finger.” (cdolan, Hacker News)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Ramp is incredible. We spend ~$1M\/month on cards… effectively saves a full FTE worth of time.” (TheMogulSkier, r\/startups)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“We moved from Chase to Ramp, literal game changer and I couldn’t go back.” (Strategic_Finance_, r\/Ramp)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“As a person that’s used a million different expense platforms, bless these ppl. This is a godsend.” (an operator on X, August 2026)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How they say it matters more than what they say. A full FTE of time is an accounting number used to brag, because in startup culture, staying small is not something you measure; it is something you boast about. Nobody gets to godsend by comparing how well two products read a receipt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This group also shows the sharpest limit on the whole position, and Ramp built that limit itself. Because limits move with the bank balance, the product that removed the checking can reinstate it without warning. A founder on X in September 2024: “Yesterday all of our Ramp cards were frozen, and I learned an important difference between Ramp and ‘real’ credit cards like we had at Chase bank… Even though I was auto-paying early and we were only at 50% of our credit limit, Ramp froze everything.” In the same thread, another operator described running two cards deliberately: “We use both. Issue Ramp cards to employees for things like one-off purchases… But for our regular monthly payments to vendors we still use a Capital One card.” That is partial refusal, and the reason underneath it is not cashback. It is what happens to a company when a payment does not go through, which is exactly what a founder was trying to stop worrying about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Same noun. Different people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Group two: the finance team at a mid-sized or large company.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A controller or a CFO with an accounting system, a purchasing process, auditors and more than one legal entity. A salesperson sells to them. They put Ramp on a shortlist and score it. They buy it to get everything in one place and keep a clean record for the audit. Their problem is different from the founder’s. The money, the vendors and the entities all keep growing, and the number of people reconciling it does not. They think slowly and out loud, and they will explain how something works before they say how it feels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“With Concur, each expense was a 30-90 second process. Using Ramp I can process all 25 of my expenses in 3 minutes.” (a reviewer on Capterra)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Our company recently integrated Ramp for our corporate cards… it’s already cut our AP posting and approval workload by about half.” (Longjumping_Reason36, r\/Netsuite)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Ramp mirrors the Intacct fields and dimensions then pushes bills and payments back into the right Intacct records… the best part is that AP does not have to go back into Intacct and fix coding afterwards.” (AppropriatePrice2301, r\/Accounting)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Ramp was the simplest integration I ever deployed. The expense management is great and AP was seamless.” (OUBrent1, r\/Netsuite)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“We switched from bill.com to Ramp recently. It’s like going from riding a tricycle to a Ferrarri.” (Entire-Result8903, r\/Netsuite)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The noun holds for the everyday work in this group, and it fails where the product runs out of road. A controller reports that they are entering treasury booking entries into Sage Intacct by hand because the sync was not smooth. Another says that at their invoice volume, the syncing was not accurate enough. A mid-market reviewer on G2 says the product “can feel restrictive if your company needs advanced workflows, multi-entity accounting, or strong international support.” A VP of finance running a formal evaluation calls Ramp Plus impressive and “still US-first,” a complaint Ramp is actively pushing back against right now, with a Canada launch in August 2026 and VAT-compliant statements for EU and UK businesses shipped in July. One team moved everything, expense management included, onto Clyr. In each of those cases, the customer went back to checking. That is not a feature gap in the ordinary sense. It is weight returning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The way this group talks explains why it is the hardest one to keep. Almost all of the emotion is aimed at the old system rather than at Ramp. Concur is described as incredibly convoluted, and the warmest things anyone says about Ramp are comparisons rather than feelings. A finance team that picked Ramp from a shortlist will keep scoring it the same way it scores Concur every year. That kind of loyalty is real, and it has to be won again every year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Same noun. Different people, and this time you can see where it stops.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Group three: accounting firms, bookkeepers and fractional CFOs.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

They are not buying it for themselves. They recommend it, set it up, and then run it across many clients at once. That means their loyalty covers a whole book of business, and when they refuse to put a client on it, the reason is worth hearing. What they are trying to do is close more books without hiring more people. They are careful and a little defensive, because one bad setup at one client costs them that client.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“A win-win tool for SMBs and their accountants.” (Natalya H., CPA firm owner, G2)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“I’ve moved two different teams over to Ramp in the past couple years, and I would do it again… The integration with our accounting system made the bookkeeping a breeze.” (Katherine Hyman, CPA)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Ramp is what Id choose if month end closing and manual cleanup is top priority. The AP workflow side is solid too.” (OpportunityLow8079, r\/Accounting)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“As an accounting professional I find it confusing. I would never recommend it to a SMB client.” (Rob Rowell, Xero App Store)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“I’m an accountant who has a client using the Ramp system and I would not recommend it to all my clients.” (an accountant, commenting under Ramp’s own partner-recruitment post on LinkedIn)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this group, the noun (position) never becomes an identity. It turns into money for the firm instead. What partners get is a faster close, cleaner books by default, and a zero-dollar platform fee compared to competitors that charge firms for access, and that is real value that shows up in their margin. What they do not get is a sense of who they are. One bookkeeper on Reddit described the position exactly and sounded like a supplier rather than a convert: if a client switches platforms, the firm changes its processes, and if the new software does not align with the firm’s expertise, the client is referred elsewhere. Another said they had moved most of their clients onto Ramp bill pay and would probably revert to traditional bank bill pay after the June 2026 fee change. Across the whole group, nobody called Ramp a partner, an advisor or a bank. Their identity is tied to the ten-day close, not to the vendor who made it possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The June 2026 fee change is the closest thing to a controlled test in the whole record because it split customers who bought a price from those who bought the feeling. A controller decided four hundred dollars a month in fees was worth paying to stop handling paper-check controls on-site. A bookkeeper decided to move a whole client portfolio back to bank bill pay. Same fee, opposite conclusions: the difference is whether the customer was buying free processing or an absence. One more voice from this group belongs on the record, because it is the failure mode in its most concentrated form: a G2 reviewer reported a credit line “reduced to ZERO after our January payment posted with absolutely no notice or communication. Field team went to use the card for gas, and was declined.” A partner who has to explain that to a client loses the client’s confidence in their own advice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Different people again. And here the noun does not hold at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Group four: the employee carrying the card.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

They did not buy it; they cannot cancel it; they cause most of the complaints; and if they hate it enough, they can get it thrown out of their own company. What they get is the ability to spend company money without having to justify it afterwards. Most of them say nothing at all. The tell is what they call it: “the app” when it works, “Ramp” when it breaks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“I love ramp!!!! Zero expense report to do.” (wheatbelly1720, r\/sales)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“We use ramp. Nearly all of this is 109% your company. I don’t have to deal with anything like that.” (brando_calrisian, r\/sales)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Ramp is the easiest expense software in the world. Death to SAP Concur.” (russianturnipofdoom, r\/sales)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The app manages most of the receipt tasks immediately after a transaction, so we don’t have to deal with a huge cleanup process at the end of the trip.” (Far_Math2289, r\/jobs)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Because of this, I’ve never had our finance dept have to follow up with me and ask for receipts, which is a win-win-win for all of us!” (a verified reviewer on G2)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This base splits in two, and the split is not about being watched. It is about the points. Cardholders who lost the ability to put company travel on a personal card lost points, elite status, and sign-up bonuses, and they describe it in terms of status and loss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“With Ramp, there are cases where the rates are significantly lower… However, the downside is that these options won’t generate points, diamond perks, or contribute to my status. Having just achieved diamond status last year after a two-year wait, I have to admit, I’m feeling a sense of loss!” (mtsublueraider, r\/Hilton)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“I feel like a second-class guest because I booked through a third-party service. It’s truly disappointing.” (ANewDinosaur, r\/Hilton)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“As a Ramp user rather than an admin, I encountered an issue with a fraudulent charge on my Ramp card… There was no phone number available, the chat feature wouldn’t load, and my emails went unanswered.” (AnotherTaxAccount, r\/Accounting)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What this group calls the product tells you more than anything else in the record. Satisfied cardholders say “the app.” Frustrated ones say “Ramp.” One booked travel through the product and described it to strangers as a third-party service without naming the vendor at all. An employee learns the name “Ramp” at the moment the product fails them, which is exactly what a product built to go unnoticed does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two details in this group matter more than the volume of complaints. First, cardholders separate the vendor from the employer’s configuration without being prompted: “Ramp has nothing to do with this. It has very flexible payment architecture; policy is mainly built by the employer,” and “Ramp simply provides the software.” Second, one of them openly endorses the trade: “While I miss out on earning points for using my personal credit card and getting reimbursed, I also appreciate that I’m not contributing to my employer’s profits.” What these people lost is money and time. It is a rewards question and a phone-number question, and better words fix neither.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Four groups, one noun, and it lands differently in each. It holds fully for the founder. For the enterprise controller, it holds for the core work but fails at the edge; when it fails, the customer goes back to checking. For the partner, it turns into money for the firm, and no identity forms at all. And it holds in its purest form for half the cardholder group while being outweighed, for the other half, by a loss Ramp inflicted on purpose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The noun explains every decision<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Product: <\/strong>policy is enforced at the card before the money moves, not audited afterwards, which is the only architecture that lets the paperwork disappear rather than get faster. Receipts arrive via text, Slack, or Teams because a portal makes an employee sit down and account for themselves, whereas a text message does not. The agents review every transaction rather than a sample, and Policy Agent, in general availability since January 2026, cuts manual review volume by around 85% for early customers while retaining a human reviewer with final authority on hard cases. A person still decides the hard ones. The paperwork around that decision is gone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pricing: <\/strong>a $0 core in a category that charges per seat. Read as a growth tactic, it is clever. Read through the noun, it is the only price that works, because weight is only removed if every employee has a card, and a per-seat fee turns giving everyone a card into a budget argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Distribution: <\/strong>the free tier lets a customer check the claim themselves. They can run Ramp alongside their existing stack at no cost and see the work go away, which means the claim gets tested without a salesperson in the room. That is why the sales and marketing share of headcount can sit near 19% while engineering sits above 40%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Partnerships and acquisitions: <\/strong>three acquisitions, all capability, none distribution. Buyer in 2021 put a negotiation service inside a software company, which means doing the customer’s unpleasant work instead of selling them a tool for it. In 2023, Cohere.io treated the wait for a support response as a product defect. In 2024, Venue moved control upstream into procurement, which is where finance headcount is normally added first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Refusals: <\/strong>no points, no tiers, no lounges, no transfer partners. No AI label on the customer-facing frame, whereas Coupa and BILL do the opposite. No headcount-cut story, told to CFOs who would have bought it. No overclaiming on the valuation posts. And, most strangely for a software company, a refusal of its own interface, in June 2026, when Ramp shipped a Model Context Protocol connector so a customer’s data could be reached without opening Ramp at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n

\n \n
\n \n

Subscribe to keep reading<\/h2>\n \n \n

\n Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.\n <\/p>\n \n \n

\n \n
\n Subscribe<\/a>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n \n<\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ramp, Eric Glyman, and the position they built by accident and never named A note before we begin: I have been watching Ramp for a while now, and I think highly of what Eric Glyman and his co-founders have built. Getting a finance product to the point where customers describe it with relief takes years […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4903,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"paid_subscribers","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":true,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"{title}\n\n{excerpt}\n\n{url}","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"rank_math_title":"","rank_math_description":"","rank_math_canonical_url":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gravity-report"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7CVvN-1h4","jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/20211130_Ramp_Founders-1-e1647826565802.webp?fit=2000%2C1334&quality=80&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4902"}],"version-history":[{"count":41,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4902\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":90181,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4902\/revisions\/90181"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/paulsyng.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}