A Note Before We Begin: I wrote this analysis because I genuinely admire what Ivan Zhao and the Notion team have built. Watching their journey, from near-bankruptcy to 100 million users, and following their social media content reveals a level of philosophical commitment rare in software companies. That commitment fascinates me.

This piece exists because I’m endlessly curious about a deeper question: How do businesses connect to identity? Not features to benefits, but what choosing a company reveals about who someone is. That connection, between what a business means and who a customer becomes, operates mostly beneath conscious awareness. It’s the territory I spend my time exploring.

I’ve tried to get the facts right. I’ve reviewed public statements, user testimonials, company updates, and competitive landscape. But I’m looking from the outside, and outside perspectives always have blind spots. If I’ve misrepresented anything, it’s not intentional. My goal isn’t to criticize but to reveal patterns that might be invisible from the inside.

Think of this as reading your label from outside the bottle. No one can read their own label. You’re too close to the work, too deep in the decisions, too invested in the vision you’re building toward. That proximity creates founder blindness. It’s not a weakness. It’s physics. You experience your business from inside; I’m observing the external patterns.

I know Ivan has data I don’t see. Customer insights, usage patterns, retention metrics, and qualitative research that shape his conviction about what Notion means and where it’s going. That internal evidence is real and valid. This analysis doesn’t invalidate that; instead, it reveals what’s visible from a different vantage point.

The entire premise of this article answers only one question:

What business are you actually in?

Not what business you think you’re in. Not what you’re building toward. But what mental territory do you occupy in customers’ minds right now? The concept that becomes synonymous with you when someone experiences the problem you solve.

Because often, what founders intend to build and what customers actually experience are different concepts operating at different cognitive levels. Both can be true. Both can be valuable. But only one determines what you own in the market.

This is my attempt to show you what I see from out here with genuine respect for the work.

PS: The CEO Clarity Starter Kit uncovered all the insights you’ll read in this perspective.

Understanding the Four Levels of Positioning

Before diagnosing where Notion actually operates, we need a framework for measuring positioning strength.

Most companies confuse articulation with ownership. They are perfect in how they talk about positioning (Level 1) while owning nothing in the customer’s minds (Level 4). This confusion explains why businesses with exceptional messaging still struggle to differentiate themselves competitively.

Positioning operates across four distinct levels:

Level 4: Owning It (Being It Perceptually)
A concept becomes synonymous with you in customers’ minds. Remove your name, and customers still automatically associate the concept with you. Volvo = safety. Tesla = future. This is a perceptual monopoly.

Takes 5-10 years to establish. Nearly impossible to copy.

Level 1: Claiming It (Saying It)
How you articulate your position through messaging and narrative. Easy to perfect, easy to copy. Words without foundation.

Duration: 3-6 months. Can be replicated overnight.

Level 2: Proving It (Doing It)
Measurable outcomes and costly signals that validate your claims. Answering: What changes? By how much? Verified how? Requires actual capability, not just communication.

Duration: 6-12 months. Moderately hard to copy.

Level 3: Living It (Being It Organizationally)
Positioning is embedded in organizational structure through resource allocation and costly commitments. 70%+ of resources aligned to positioning-critical capabilities.

Duration: 12-24 months. Hard to copy without restructuring.

The critical insight: You cannot skip levels. Each builds on the previous. Most companies operate only at Level 1 (claiming through words) while believing they’re at Level 4 (owning in minds).

The implicit positioning principle compounds this: The moment you explicitly claim something, you weaken it. Implicit ownership stems from structural decisions that create automatic associations, rather than from explicit marketing claims.

But sometimes, rarely, a company operates at Level 4 without realizing it. They own a concept through structural decisions and user experience, but articulate something different at Level 1.

Now, let’s diagnose where Notion actually operates.

Part 1: The Story They Tell

Ivan Zhao doesn’t tell a typical SaaS founder story. He tells a philosopher’s tale.

“To make it possible for everyone to shape the tools that shape their lives.” That’s been the mission since 2013, unchanged through near-bankruptcy, a complete rebuild in Kyoto, and the climb to 100 million users and a $10 billion valuation.

Zhao invokes Douglas Engelbart’s 1962 vision of “augmenting human intellect,” positioning Notion within the grand narrative of computing history. He’s not building productivity software. He’s completing the unfinished revolution where software adapts to human thinking rather than forcing conformity to rigid paradigms.

The company’s narrative centers on learning from failure. The 2015 version flopped spectacularly. Too complex. Wrong tech stack. It crashed constantly. They burned through money, laid off the team, and nearly died. Zhao borrowed $150,000 from his mother and relocated to Kyoto with co-founder Simon Last to rebuild everything from scratch.

The breakthrough insight they credit: “sugar-coated broccoli.” Hide the revolutionary vision (democratizing software creation) inside something people already want (notes and documents). Let users discover power progressively. Come for the notes, stay for the databases.

The frameworks they cite:

Product-led growth through freemium virality. Community-led expansion via 200+ global ambassadors. Bottom-up enterprise adoption where individuals choose Notion, prove value, then spread it through organizations. The template economy, as distributed R&D, over 30,000 templates created by users solving their own problems.

The metrics they obsess over:

100 million users (5x growth in two years). 70% of users replaced two or more tools after adopting Notion. 13% conversion rate from free to paid. 50%+ of Fortune 500 companies use Notion. 68% of Y Combinator companies default to Notion.

The tactical choices they emphasize:

A generous free tier that allows individuals to consolidate their digital lives without incurring any costs. Template marketplace that solves the blank canvas problem. Block-based architecture that’s “LEGO for software,” simple individually, infinitely combinable. Integration ecosystem with 1,000+ partners. AI features that “do work for you.”

The linguistic pattern:

Notice what Zhao uses consistently: verbs, not nouns.

“Augment human intellect” (verb phrase describing action)
“Create their own software” (verb phrase describing capability)
“Make toolmaking ubiquitous” (verb phrase describing goal)
“Empower users to build” (verb phrase describing outcome)

He’s describing actions, what Notion helps you do, rather than concepts — what Notion means in customers’ minds.

Even when they use nouns like “connected workspace,” “all-in-one platform,” and “cognitive infrastructure,” these are descriptive categories, not exclusive mental territories.

The tell: Zhao thinks he’s building toward “software empowerment.” His team frames around “flexibility” and “all-in-one.” But neither captures what’s actually happening in customer minds.

Part 2: What They Actually Own (Reading the Label)

Here’s what customers say when unprompted:

“My whole life lives in Notion”
“Everything finally makes sense”
“My workspace finally matches how I think”
“I can see my thinking”
“I don’t have to fight my tools anymore”
“Transforms the way you work”
“Visualize my brain”

Notice the transformation language: Not “Notion is flexible” or “Notion empowered me.” But “everything makes sense,” “finally matches how I think,” “I can see my thinking.”

Users aren’t describing product features. They’re describing a state change: from scattered and fragmented to unified and comprehensible.

The pattern across thousands of testimonials:

Before Notion: Information scattered across 15 tools. Thoughts trapped in heads or poorly captured. Projects fragmented. Knowledge isolated. Mental models that don’t match external systems. Cognitive load from maintaining fragmentation.

After Notion: Information integrated. Thoughts externalized with high fidelity. Projects connected. Knowledge linked. Mental models and external systems aligned. Cognitive relief.

This isn’t tool consolidation. This is achieving coherence, the state where scattered elements become an integrated, sensible whole.

Testing what Notion actually owns:

Remove their name and explicit claims. When knowledge workers experience scattered information and cognitive fragmentation, what do they reach for?

The sophisticated ones (Systems Thinkers, Builder Mindsets, the 280,000-member Reddit community) automatically think “Notion.” Not consciously evaluating features. Automatically associating the tool with solving fragmentation.

When Marie Poulin builds a $500K+ business teaching “Notion for life organization,” she’s not teaching flexibility. She’s teaching people how to achieve cognitive coherence; how to take scattered life information and create unified systems that make sense.

When template creators build six-figure businesses, they’re not selling “flexible templates.” They’re selling coherence patterns; proven structures that help people integrate scattered elements quickly.

When companies make Notion their “single source of truth,” they’re not choosing flexibility. They’re choosing coherence; one unified system where everything connects.

The concept Notion actually owns:

Coherence for knowledge work.

Not as an aspiration. Not as a marketing claim. As lived reality in customer behaviour and language.

Compare to competitor’s mental territory:

When someone needs enterprise productivity → Microsoft 365
When someone needs cloud collaboration → Google Workspace
When someone needs project clarity → Asana
When someone needs flexible databases → Airtable
When someone needs scattered information to make sense → Notion

That automatic association “I need coherence” triggering “Notion” already exists in sophisticated user segments. It’s not yet fully developed across the mass market, but a perceptual monopoly is forming.

Why Zhao doesn’t see this?

He’s building from identity: “I want to democratize software creation and augment human intellect.”

Users are buying transformation: “I need my scattered information to make sense.”

These aren’t contradictory. Coherence is how intellect gets augmented. Scattered thinking limits cognitive capability. Coherent thinking expands it. Zhao’s vision and user reality are aligned; just using different language for the same transformation.

The noun/verb architecture revealing ownership:

What Zhao claims (verbs): “Augment,” “empower,” “create,” “enable”
What Notion delivers (verbs): Consolidates, organizes, connects, structures, integrates

What users experience (noun): Coherence

The verbs prove the noun. The actions create the state. Notion delivers coherence through flexibility; flexibility is the mechanism, coherence is the outcome. But Zhao articulates the mechanism (flexibility, empowerment) while users experience and express the outcome (coherence).

Evidence of ownership:

1. User language converges on coherence: “Makes sense,” “unified,” “integrated,” “connected,” “my thinking visible”
2. Identity expression through coherence: Using Notion signals “I’m someone who needs/achieves unified systems”
3. Template economy proves coherence demand: 30,000+ templates exist because users want proven patterns for achieving integration
4. Community organizes around coherence: Reddit discussions, YouTube tutorials, courses, all teaching how to achieve unified systems
5. B2B adoption driven by coherence need: “Single source of truth,” “knowledge base,” “company brain,” all coherence language
6. Switching costs are coherence costs: Users can’t leave because their entire cognitive architecture lives in Notion’s integrated structure

The reveal:

Notion already owns coherence. They just don’t realize it because:

• They’re articulating what they intend (empowerment)
• Instead of naming what they deliver (coherence)
• While users experience and express the transformation (coherence)

This is the positioning paradox: You already own what you think you’re building toward.

Part 3: The Level They’re Actually Operating At (The Reveal)

Level 4 Assessment (Owning It Perceptually)

Does Notion own a concept in customers’ minds?

For “empowerment” and “flexibility”: No. These are what they claim (Level 1), not what they own (Level 4).

For “coherence”: Yes, partially and in formation.

The ownership test for coherence:

Remove Notion’s name. When sophisticated knowledge workers experience scattered information and fragmentation, they automatically think “Notion.” Not through conscious feature evaluation. Through automatic association.

Evidence:

• 280,000-member Reddit community organizing around achieving unified systems
• Six-figure template businesses selling coherence patterns
• “Second brain” movement centring on Notion as the primary tool
• Companies adopting Notion specifically for a “single source of truth”
• Users describing Notion in coherence language (“makes sense,” “unified,” “integrated”)

This automatic association isn’t yet universal across all market segments. It’s strongest in:

• Systems Thinkers and knowledge workers
• Tech-forward companies
• Personal productivity enthusiasts
• Information-heavy roles

But the perceptual monopoly is forming. When these users need coherence, Notion is the automatic answer.

The competitive test:

When Microsoft launches Loop (flexible workspace), does it strengthen or weaken Notion’s position?

It doesn’t damage Notion’s core users because Loop doesn’t deliver coherence. It delivers flexibility within Microsoft’s ecosystem. The blocks are flexible, but the integration is shallow compared to Notion’s relational databases and cross-referencing architecture. When Coda adds features, when ClickUp adds customization, they’re competing on flexibility (Level 2 capabilities). Notion competes on coherence (Level 4 transformation).

The switching cost test:

Why can’t power users leave Notion even when competitors match features?

Because their entire cognitive architecture (how they think, how they structure knowledge, and how they work) is embedded in Notion’s coherence infrastructure. Switching costs aren’t feature-based. They’re coherence-based.

Marie Poulin can’t move to Coda or ClickUp because her entire business model depends on Notion’s specific coherence architecture. Her $ 500,000+ business exists because Notion delivers coherence in a way that competitors don’t.

Level 4 Status: Owns coherence in sophisticated user segments. Ownership is forming but not yet explicitly named or universally established.

Level 1 Assessment (Claiming/Framing)

What does Notion explicitly claim?

“Software empowerment,” “flexibility,” “all-in-one workspace,” “cognitive infrastructure,” “augmenting human intellect.”

None of these are coherence. The articulation doesn’t match the owned concept.

The articulation quality: Exceptional. Philosophically consistent for a decade. Beautifully executed. World-class framing.

The articulation-ownership misalignment: Zhao articulates empowerment while delivering coherence. The messaging clarity creates a perception of strong positioning, which is accurate, but obscures what’s actually owned.

This explains the confusion:

• Zhao thinks he’s building toward empowerment (aspiration)
• Users think they’re getting flexibility (mechanism)
• Reality: Both are experiencing coherence (transformation)

Level 1 Status: Exceptional articulation of concepts they don’t own (empowerment, flexibility). No explicit articulation of the concept they own (coherence).

Level 2 Assessment (Proving/Executing)

Can Notion prove coherence? Are they delivering measurable outcomes that validate the transformation from fragmented to coherent?

The implicit proof (structural decisions):

1. Blocks architecture: Enables connection between any information types. Proves integration capability structurally.
2. Relational databases: Creates relationships between scattered information. Proves coherence mechanically.
3. Cross-references and backlinks: Automatically surfaces connections. Proves network effects of integration.
4. Template ecosystem: 30,000+ patterns for achieving coherence across domains. Proves replicable transformation.
5. Free tier generosity: Lets users prove coherence value to themselves before paying. Costly signal.

These aren’t features. These are costly structural commitments that prove Notion delivers coherence. Competitors can’t replicate this architecture without fundamental rebuilds.

The explicit proof (missing):

Notion doesn’t measure coherence explicitly:

• No fragmentation baseline before adoption
• No integration metrics after adoption
• No coherence improvement quantification
• No cognitive load reduction measurement

They prove coherence structurally but don’t measure it explicitly.

Level 2 Status: Strong implicit proof of coherence through costly structural decisions. Weak explicit proof through measurement and quantification.

Level 3 Assessment (Living/Being It Organizationally)

Is coherence embedded in organizational structure through resource allocation?

Evidence of coherence commitment:

1. Blocks system investment: Core infrastructure enabling integration (coherence-critical capability)
2. Database infrastructure: Relational architecture enabling connection (coherence-specific)
3. Template community: Resources supporting coherence pattern distribution
4. Integration architecture: Connecting scattered tools into a unified interface

But:

5. 2025 priorities: “Performance, offline, reliability, scale, mobile,” table stakes, not coherence-specific
6. AI investment: Content generation, not coherence acceleration (surfacing connections, measuring fragmentation)
7. Enterprise features: Basic productivity, not coherence at the organizational scale

Resource allocation test:

Is 70%+ of resources aligned to coherence-critical capabilities?

Partially. Core infrastructure (blocks, databases, connections) proves coherence. But resources are fragmented across:

• Basic functionality (performance, mobile)
• AI commodity features (generation, summarization)
• Enterprise basics (security, permissions)

Not fully concentrated on coherence deepening.

Level 3 Status: Moderate alignment. Core infrastructure demonstrates coherence, but resources become fragmented, preventing the development of deep structural inevitability.

The Complete Level Diagnostic

Where Notion actually operates:

• Level 4 (Owning): Owns coherence in sophisticated segments. (but doesn’t explicitly name it)
• Level 1 (Claiming): Articulates empowerment/flexibility (misaligned with owned concept)
• Level 2 (Proving): Strong implicit proof. Weak explicit proof
• Level 3 (Living): Moderate structural alignment ~ (core strong, resources fragmented)

The revelation:

Notion operates at Level 4 for coherence without realizing it. They own the concept through structural decisions and user experience. But they articulate something different at Level 1.

This is the opposite of typical positioning problems. Most companies claim concepts they don’t own (Level 1 without Level 4). Notion owns a concept they don’t claim (Level 4 without Level 1).

Why this happens:

Founder identity. Zhao’s identity requires building “software empowerment.” That’s what he sees, what he articulates, what he thinks he’s creating.

However, the structural decisions he makes (blocks that enable connection, databases that enable relationships, and templates that enable pattern replication) all prove coherence.

His identity drives Level 1 articulation (empowerment). His structural decisions create Level 4 ownership (coherence). The misalignment is invisible from the inside.

Part 4: The Identity Layer (Why Coherence Resonates)

Customer Identity: Who Notion Actually Attracts

Notion doesn’t attract demographics. It attracts people experiencing cognitive fragmentation who need coherence.

Identity Profile 1: The Systems Thinker

Thinks in networks. Sees connections. Frustrated by linear tools. Needs structure to emerge, not be imposed.

Notion resonates because it delivers cognitive coherence. Their scattered thinking can finally become unified systems.

What using Notion signals: “I’m someone who thinks in integrated systems, not isolated tasks.”

Identity Profile 2: The Efficiency Optimizer

Experiences cognitive pain from context-switching. Seeks to eliminate redundancy. Values integrated workflows.

Notion resonates because it delivers operational coherence. Their scattered tools become a unified workspace.

What using Notion signals: “I’m someone who achieves efficiency through integration, not multiplication.”

Identity Profile 3: The Builder Mindset

Enjoys creating systems. Thinks structurally. Gains satisfaction from custom solutions.

Notion resonates because it delivers structural coherence. They can build integrated architectures that match their thinking.

What using Notion signals: “I’m someone who creates unified systems, not just uses disconnected tools.”

Identity Profile 4: The Overwhelmed Professional (the growth opportunity)

Drowning in information. Struggling to stay organized. Needs simplicity but faces complexity.

Notion doesn’t fully resonate yet because: The path to coherence feels steep. Templates help, but the learning curve remains a barrier.

What they need: Coherence (unified systems).
What they fear: Complexity to achieve it.

The identity pattern:

All four profiles seek the same transformation: From fragmentation to coherence. Different starting points, same destination.

• Systems Thinkers seek cognitive coherence
• Efficiency Optimizers seek operational coherence
• Builder Mindsets seek structural coherence
• Overwhelmed Professionals seek organizational coherence

All four experience cognitive fragmentation. All four need unified systems. All four would benefit from explicit coherence positioning.

What using Notion actually expresses:

Not “I’m productive,” or “I’m organized,” or “I’m empowered.”

But: “I’ve achieved coherence. My scattered information makes sense. My thinking is unified. My work is integrated.”

This is an expression of identity through transformation, not features.

B2B Identity Dynamics:

In enterprises, choosing Notion expresses organizational identity:

“We’re sophisticated enough to need integrated knowledge systems” (not just task management)

“We value unified information architecture” (not just collaboration tools)

“We’re building toward coherence” (not just productivity)

The CTO advocating for Notion isn’t just choosing a tool. They’re expressing: “I see that our scattered information is limiting us. We need coherence.”

Founder Identity: How Zhao’s Vision Aligns With Coherence

Zhao’s identity: Philosopher-craftsman completing Engelbart’s vision of augmenting human intellect.

This feels different from “coherence” to Zhao. But it’s not.

The alignment:

Scattered thinking limits intellect. Coherent thinking augments it.

Engelbart’s vision of “augmenting human intellect” is about removing cognitive limitations. Fragmentation is a cognitive limitation. Coherence removes it.

Zhao’s philosophical vision (augmenting intellect) and market reality (achieving coherence) are the same transformation at different abstraction levels.

Empowerment through software creation is one path to coherence. But coherence is what actually augments intellect, whether achieved through building or through using.

Why Zhao doesn’t see the alignment:

His identity is invested in the mechanism (empowerment, building, creating). The market experiences the outcome (coherence, integration, sense-making).

Both are true. Both are valuable. But the market buys outcomes, not mechanisms.

Identity-Level Alignment:

Does customer identity align with Notion’s owned position (coherence)?

Yes! Powerfully. Every identity profile seeks coherence transformation. The concept resonates universally because everyone experiences some form of fragmentation.

If Notion is explicitly positioned around coherence:

• Systems Thinkers: “I achieve cognitive coherence”
• Efficiency Optimizers: “I achieve operational coherence”
• Builder Mindsets: “I build coherent systems”
• Overwhelmed Professionals: “I finally have coherent organization”

All four identities are served by one concept.

Part 5: The Success Mechanics (What’s Actually Working)

What’s Working: Delivering Coherence

1. Structural coherence proof creating gravitational pull

The blocks architecture, relational databases, and cross-references aren’t “flexible features.” They’re coherence infrastructure. They structurally enable integration.

This is why users can’t leave. Their coherence lives in Notion’s structure.

This is why the 70% tool replacement rate exists. Not because Notion is “all-in-one,” but because scattered tools become coherent systems in Notion.

This is why Fortune 500 companies adopt bottom-up. Knowledge workers achieve coherence individually, then spread it because coherence has network effects; the more information in the system, the more valuable integration becomes.

2. Community proving coherence is achievable

30,000+ templates don’t prove “flexibility.” They prove coherence is replicable. Each template is a coherence pattern. A proven structure for integrating scattered information in a specific domain.

Marie Poulin’s business model validates the demand for coherence. She’s not teaching “how to use flexible tools.” She’s teaching “how to achieve cognitive coherence,” which involves taking scattered life information and creating unified systems.

The Reddit community, YouTube tutorials, and courses are all organized around achieving unified systems. The community validates that coherence is the transformation users seek.

3. Identity expression through coherence achievement

Users who invest in building Notion systems aren’t expressing “I’m productive.” They’re expressing “I’ve achieved coherent thinking/working/living.”

The elaborate workspaces users share publicly signal: “I’ve transformed fragmentation into integration.” This is an expression of identity through coherence demonstration.

4. Switching costs are coherence costs

Why can’t users leave even when competitors match features? Because leaving means cognitive re-fragmentation. Their entire mental model, knowledge architecture, and working system would scatter again.

The switching cost is coherence loss. That’s more powerful than feature lock-in.

5. Implicit coherence ownership in sophisticated segments

Power users, template creators, “second brain” enthusiasts, these sophisticated segments automatically associate Notion with achieving coherence. The perceptual monopoly exists in these tribes.

This is Level 4 ownership in formation. Not yet universal, but real.

What They’re Missing: Explicitly Naming What They Own

1. Level 1 misalignment blocking the mass market

Zhao articulates “empowerment.”
Teams frame “flexibility.”
Users experience “coherence.”

The articulation-ownership misalignment limits market expansion. Overwhelmed Professionals need coherence but don’t see it in Notion’s messaging. They see complexity (learning curve) without seeing transformation (coherence achievement).

If Notion explicitly positioned itself around coherence: “Unified systems for scattered information,” the value proposition becomes immediately clear.

2. No explicit coherence measurement (Level 2 gap)

Notion proves coherence structurally, but doesn’t measure it explicitly.

Missing metrics:

• Fragmentation reduction (scattered → unified)
• Integration velocity (time to connect information)
• Coherence maintenance (system health over time)
• Cognitive load reduction (mental effort saved)

Without explicit measurement, Notion can’t fully prove the transformation at Level 2.

3. Resource fragmentation preventing coherence deepening

Current investment fragments across:

• Basic functionality (performance, mobile)
• AI commodity (content generation)
• Enterprise basics (security, scale)

Should concentrate on coherence-critical:

• Connection intelligence (surfacing hidden relationships)
• Integration acceleration (faster path to unified systems)
• Coherence visualization (showing information architecture health)
• Fragmentation alerts (preventing coherence degradation)

4. AI investment reinforcing flexibility, not coherence

Notion AI does what every productivity AI does: generates, summarizes, and automates.

Should do coherence-specific work:

• Surface connections between isolated information
• Suggest integration patterns based on content
• Visualize knowledge architecture
• Measure and display coherence metrics

5. Enterprise positioning is missing a coherence angle

Enterprise buyers need coherence desperately: scattered information across departments, disconnected tools, fragmented knowledge.

But Notion frames enterprise value as “flexible workspace” and “team collaboration.” Should frame as “organizational coherence infrastructure.”

The Success Pattern:

What’s working is coherence delivery. What’s missing is coherence articulation.

Notion owns coherence through structural decisions and user experience. They don’t explicitly name it, measure it, or allocate resources to deepen it.

Part 6: The Coaching Moment (You Already Own It. Now Strengthen It)

The Fundamental Reframe

You’re not building toward ownership. You already own it. You think you’re creating empowerment. You’re actually delivering coherence. These aren’t contradictory. Coherence is how empowerment manifests, how intellect gets augmented, how thinking becomes powerful.

But the market doesn’t buy mechanisms. They buy transformations.

You’ve built the mechanism (flexibility enabling integration). Users experience the transformation (fragmentation becoming coherence). You just need to name what’s already happening.

What You Already Have at Level 4

You own coherence in sophisticated user segments:

• Power users automatically reach for Notion when facing fragmentation
• Template creators build six-figure businesses on coherence patterns
• “Second brain” movement centers on Notion as primary tool
• Companies adopt Notion specifically for “single source of truth”
• Reddit community organizes around achieving unified systems
• Switching costs are coherence-based, not feature-based

This is perceptual monopoly in formation. You’re at Level 4 for coherence — you just don’t realize it because you’re articulating something different at Level 1.

The Four-Level Strengthening Path

Phase 1: Align Level 1 articulation with Level 4 ownership (3-6 months)

Stop articulating what you’re building toward (empowerment). Start naming what you’ve already achieved (coherence).

The linguistic shift:

From: “Augment human intellect,” “Create your own software,” “Flexible workspace”

To: “Where scattered information becomes coherent systems,” “Unified workspace for fragmented knowledge,” “Integration for scattered thinking”

Not claiming new territory. Naming owned territory.

The positioning:

Not: “Notion delivers coherence” (claim)
But: “This is what coherence looks like” (reveal)

You’re not claiming to deliver something. You’re helping users recognize what they’re already experiencing.

Why this honors Zhao’s vision:

Coherence is how intellect gets augmented. Scattered thinking limits cognitive capability. Coherent thinking expands it. Engelbart’s vision (augmenting intellect) and market reality (achieving coherence) are aligned.

You’re not abandoning the vision. You’re explicitly naming how the vision manifests for knowledge workers today.

Phase 2: Build Level 2 explicit proof (6-12 months)

You prove coherence structurally through architecture. Now prove it explicitly through measurement.

Metric 1: Fragmentation Reduction

• Baseline: Information scatter before Notion (tools, locations, disconnected elements)
• Outcome: Integration after adoption (unified system, connected elements)
• Target: 70% reduction in information scatter

Metric 2: Integration Velocity

• Baseline: Time to connect related information across tools
• Outcome: Connection speed in Notion
• Target: 80% faster integration

Metric 3: Coherence Maintenance

• Baseline: System degradation over time (information re-scattering)
• Outcome: Sustained coherence in Notion
• Target: 90% coherence retention over 12 months

Metric 4: Cognitive Load Reduction

• Baseline: Mental effort maintaining scattered systems
• Outcome: Effort reduction with unified system
• Target: 60% cognitive load reduction

These metrics make explicit what users experience implicitly. They quantify the transformation you already deliver.

Phase 3: Deepen Level 3 structural commitment (12-24 months)

Concentrate 70%+ of resources on coherence-critical capabilities.

Coherence Dashboard
Show users their information architecture health
Display: connection density, orphaned information, integration opportunities
Goal: Make coherence visible and improvable

Integration Intelligence
AI that surfaces connections between isolated information
Show: hidden relationships, suggested links, pattern recognition
Goal: Accelerate coherence achievement

Coherence Templates
Pre-built patterns optimized for integration, not just function
Based on: proven coherence architectures across domains
Goal: Faster path to unified systems

Fragmentation Prevention
System health monitoring and alerts
Alert: when information becomes isolated or duplicated
Goal: Maintain coherence over time

These aren’t new positioning. These are deepening owned positioning.

Phase 4: Expand Level 4 ownership (24-48+ months)

You own coherence in sophisticated segments. Expand to the mass market.

Current ownership: Power users, template creators, tech-forward companies
Target ownership: Overwhelmed Professionals, traditional enterprises, mainstream knowledge workers

The expansion path:

Make coherence achievement faster and easier. The transformation is powerful; reduce time/effort to achieve it.

• Faster onboarding to coherent systems
• Simpler templates for common coherence patterns
• Guided paths from fragmentation to integration
• Success metrics showing coherence progress

As more users achieve coherence, the perceptual monopoly strengthens. “I need coherence” → “I need Notion” becomes universal, not just sophisticated-segment association.

Timeline: 3-5 years to universal Level 4 ownership

You’re already partway there. The foundation exists. The ownership is forming. Just needs explicit naming and systematic strengthening.

The Critical Principle: You’re Not Starting From Zero

Most positioning strategies require building from Level 1 to Level 4 over 5-10 years.

You’re at Level 4 already. You just need to:

• Align Level 1 articulation with owned concept
• Build Level 2 explicit proof of implicit delivery
• Deepen Level 3 resource concentration
• Expand Level 4 ownership to broader segments

This isn’t “create new positioning.” This is “strengthen existing ownership.”

The Founder Decision: Can Zhao See The Alignment?

The hardest part isn’t strategy. It’s seeing that coherence honours the vision.

Zhao’s identity investment: “Augmenting human intellect through software empowerment”

Market reality: “Achieving cognitive coherence through integrated systems”

These are the same transformation. Scattered thinking limits intellect. Coherent thinking augments it. Empowerment through building is one path. Empowerment through integration is another path. Both lead to coherence.

The vision doesn’t change. The articulation aligns with reality.

What You’ll Know When This Works

You’ll know coherence ownership is strengthened when:

1. Mass market adoption accelerates – Overwhelmed Professionals adopt because the value proposition is clear: “scattered information becomes coherent”
2. Enterprise sales expand – Companies buy “organizational coherence infrastructure,” not “flexible workspace”
3. Competitive threats diminish – When Microsoft/Google add flexibility, it doesn’t threaten you because you own coherence, not flexibility
4. User language converges – Everyone describes Notion as “where scattered information makes sense,” not “flexible tool”
5. Category leadership solidifies – You define a new category: “Coherence Infrastructure for Knowledge Work”
6. Pricing power increases – Coherence transformation commands premium over flexibility features

Finally

You already own what you think you’re building toward.

The blocks architecture proves coherence structurally. The template ecosystem proves coherence is replicable. The user’s language proves coherence is experienced. The community proves that coherence is valued. The switching costs prove coherence is owned.

You just haven’t explicitly named it.

This isn’t a positioning problem. This is a recognition problem.

You own coherence. You’ve owned it for years, through structural decisions, user experience, and market behaviour.

All that’s missing is explicitly naming what you already deliver, measuring what you already create, and concentrating resources on deepening what you already own.

The position exists. The ownership is forming. The perceptual monopoly is building.

You just can’t see it because you’re reading from inside the bottle.

From out here, it’s clear:

Notion is coherence for knowledge work.

You already own it. Now claim it. Prove it explicitly. Live it completely. And expand it universally.

The ladder doesn’t need climbing. You’re already at the top.

You just need to look down and see where you actually stand.

---

Find what you own in sixty minutes.

Before you hire a messaging consultant to wordsmith your homepage, or an agency to “refresh your brand,” or someone to fix what they’ll call positioning (but is really just tactical framing), try this first.

The CEO Clarity Starter Kit

It does exactly what we just read. It helps you find and own your noun.

What you do:

• Run the Position Audit (reveals what noun you might already own without knowing it)
• Complete the 8-Question Advisor (the same questions that would surface “coherence” for Notion)
• Feed the output into ClarityGPT (included)

What you get:

• Your noun. The concept you can actually own, not just claim
• A 4-Level Positioning Canvas showing how to move from saying it to OWNING it
• ClarityGPT translates your position into landing pages, offers, and LinkedIn profiles (written in your buyer’s voice, not consultant-speak)
• A 30-day positioning course so you can apply this method without me

Time required: About an hour (less time than reading three more case studies about tactics that won’t work without position)

Who’s used it: 200+ CEOs and founders who were tired of pushing uphill

Investment: $249 USD

Most realize they don’t need the consultant or agency after this. Or they need far less than they thought. Because once you know your noun (your position), the tactics become obvious. The distribution chooses itself. The customers explain you better than you explain yourself.

And yes, if you buy the kit, it nudges me closer to that Porsche in the photo. Thanks in advance for supporting excellent positioning and questionable life choices.

Stop competing on features. Start owning concepts.

Get your CEO Clarity Starter Kit